Legal Opinion

State v. Huskey

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1984No. 14473PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

A jury found Kenneth Huskey guilty of five counts of embezzlement. On appeal, his sole claim of error concerns the district court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search. 1 The issue is whether the search was within the scope of a search warrant, or — in any event— whether the search was justified under an exception to the warrant requirement. Because we hold the search valid under the consent exception, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

This case focuses upon the second of two searches conducted after Huskey had been arrested on the embezzlement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. KnappIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. State v. RushoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. CurtisIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. MartinezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. BrauchIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API