Legal Opinion

Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho Falls

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1968No. 10094PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Appellant, Ben Lomond, Inc., the plaintiff below, instituted this action initially for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant City of Idaho Falls to issue a building permit for construction of a service station on its property. Appellant’s property, the subject of this action, is a tract 110' x 125' with an adjoining easement. The tract fronts on what is now 17th Street of the City of Idaho Falls, and is a part of a larger tract initially owned by appellant. By amended pleadings appellant later sought declaratory relief against the City to determine the constitutionality…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ogden v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Russian Hill Improvement Ass'n v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Hughes v. State Ex Rel. Idaho Board of Highway DirectorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State ex rel. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. WahnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Citizens for Mount Vernon v. Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Payette River Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Smith v. Winhall Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of LudlowSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  5. Ready-To-Pour, Inc. v. McCoyIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API