Legal Opinion

E. Liverpool v. Columbiana Cty. Budget Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2000No. 2000-0252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 269.] CITY OF EAST LIVERPOOL, APPELLEE, v. COLUMBIANA COUNTY BUDGET COMMISSION; BUTLER TOWNSHIP ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as E. Liverpool v. Columbiana Cty. Budget Comm.,

2000-Ohio-75.] Taxation—Income tax—Apportioning Undivided Local Government Fund and Undivided Local Government Revenue Assistance Fund—Approval of alternate formula for apportioning monies in funds—Notice of appeal filed by city of East Liverpool when dissatisfied with amounts it was to receive from these funds—Decision of Board of Tax Appeals affirmed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Summit United Methodist Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. City of Lancaster v. Fairfield County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. City of East Liverpool v. Columbiana County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lancaster v. Fairfield Cty. Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of East Liverpool v. Columbiana County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State ex rel. Satow v. Gausse-MillikenOhio Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API