Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Satow v. Gausse-Milliken

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2003No. 2003-0150PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This case challenges the apportionment and distribution of money from the Undivided Local Government Fund (“ULGF”) and Undivided Local Government Revenue Assistance Fund (“ULGRAF”) pursuant to 2002 Sub.HJB. No. 329 (“H.B. 329”) by respondents, who are the Columbiana County Treasurer, the Columbiana County Auditor, and members of the Columbiana County Budget Commission (“CCBC”).

{¶ 2} R.C. Chapter 5747 established ULGF and ULGRAF to receive certain state tax revenues, which are transferred to counties for distribution to local subdivisions. E. Liverpool v. Columbiana Cty. Budget Comm.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Zupancic v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Stamps v. Automatic Data Processing BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State ex rel. Walker v. City of Bowling GreenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Cunningham v. Amer Cunningham Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Jaffal v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Tatman v. Fairfield County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Maloney v. SherlockOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Ministerial Day Care Ass'n v. ZelmanOhio Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API