Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Fairfield Cty. Budget Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1999No. 1998-1059PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 137.] CITY OF LANCASTER, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. FAIRFIELD COUNTY BUDGET COMMISSION ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES. [Cite as Lancaster v. Fairfield Cty. Budget Comm.,

1999-Ohio-142.] Taxation—Income tax—R.C. 5747.53 and 5747.63—Apportioning Undivided Local Government Fund and Undivided Local Government Revenue Assistance Fund—Approval of alternative formula for apportioning monies in fundsGovernmental units that have not limited their approvals to a specific period of time need not thereafter annually…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Lancaster v. Fairfield County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. City of Lancaster v. Fairfield County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. City of Girard v. Trumbull County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Lancaster v. Fairfield Cty. Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Township of Andover v. Ashtabula County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. E. Liverpool v. Columbiana Cty. Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. E. Liverpool v. Columbiana Cty. Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Reynoldsburg v. Licking Cty. Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API