Legal Opinion

Summit United Methodist Church v. Kinney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1983No. 83-385PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

Appellant contends that the subject property qualifies for a tax exemption under R.C. 5709.07 or, alternatively, under R.C. 5709.12.

R.C. 5709.07 states in pertinent part:

“* * * [Hjouses used exclusively for public worship, * * * and not leased or otherwise used with a view to profit, * * * shall be exempt from taxation. * *

The language exempts from taxation houses used exclusively for public worship and not leased or otherwise used with a view to profit. The “used exclusively” language was construed in Bishop v. Kinney (1982), 2 Ohio St. 3d 52. The primary use test, which allowed an exemption…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Citizens Financial Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In Re Bond Hill-Roselawn Hebrew SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Episcopal Parish of Christ Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Aluminum Co. of America v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Columbus City School District Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. American Fiber Systems, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Faith Fellowship Ministries, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Moraine Heights Baptist Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. True Christianity Evangelism v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API