Summit United Methodist Church v. Kinney
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.
Appellant contends that the subject property qualifies for a tax exemption under R.C. 5709.07 or, alternatively, under R.C. 5709.12.
R.C. 5709.07 states in pertinent part:
“* * * [Hjouses used exclusively for public worship, * * * and not leased or otherwise used with a view to profit, * * * shall be exempt from taxation. * *
The language exempts from taxation houses used exclusively for public worship and not leased or otherwise used with a view to profit. The “used exclusively” language was construed in Bishop v. Kinney (1982), 2 Ohio St. 3d 52. The primary use test, which allowed an exemption…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Citizens Financial Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re Bond Hill-Roselawn Hebrew SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Episcopal Parish of Christ Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Aluminum Co. of America v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Columbus City School District Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- American Fiber Systems, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Faith Fellowship Ministries, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Moraine Heights Baptist Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- True Christianity Evangelism v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.