Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. Lindley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
The Tax Commissioner herein appeals a number of the board’s determinations. For reasons set forth, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
The commissioner’s first argument is that the board erred in determining that appellees’ purchases of a refrigerant tank which stored ammonia, and two Muller tanks which stored ice cream flavoring were excepted from sales taxation as adjuncts to property used or consumed directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale under R. C. 5739.01(E)(2) and 5739.01 (S).
The record indicates that the refrigerant tank interconnects with a refrigeration…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Custom Beverage Packers, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Highlights for Children, Inc. v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Cole National Corp. v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Emery Industries, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- American National Can Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.