Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Bldg. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1932No. 23206PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The six concurring members of this court agree that the question presented is identical with the one heretofore presented by demurrer to the petition in this case and reported in 124 Ohio St. 413, 179 N.E. 138. No other question has been before this court for consideration. Let no layman be misled — the bench and bar will not be. There was but one legal issue made by the demurrer to the petition, and the same issue is made by demurrer to the answer. The clear issue of law in this case — and it is the only issue in this case — is whether a public contract may be denied to the lowest bidder…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Bldg. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. George Harms Construction Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. Mugford v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Crosby v. RathOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Chambers v. Owens-Ames-Kimball Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Lundblad v. CelesteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API