Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Bldg. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1931No. 23206PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action in mandamus filed in this court, wherein the relator seeks a writ compelling the defendants to enter into a contract with the relator for the construction of a steam and electric transmission line from the Ohio Penitentiary to the State Office Building, in the city of Columbus, and to accept the relator's bond filed therewith. The cause was presented to this court upon a demurrer to the petition of the relator. While the petition contains a detailed history of the transaction, the salient facts contained in the petition and conceded to be true by the demurrer are as follows:

U…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adams v. BrenanIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Holden v. City of AltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Miller v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. City of Atlanta v. SteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Marshall & Bruce Co. v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cedar Bay Construction, Inc. v. City of FremontOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Chambers v. Owens-Ames-Kimball Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Lundblad v. CelesteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Bldg. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. Wilmington Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API