Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Rath

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1940No. 27639PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The question as to the validity of the three-month, written, renewable employment contracts here involved requires no discussion. Both the Court of Common Pleas and the Court of Appeals held them valid, and a study of the record discloses nothing tending to support the contention of the defendants to the contrary.

The controlling question in the case is whether the evidence discloses the existence of a legitimate trade dispute. However, this difficulty is simplified by the fact that both the plaintiff and the defendants rely upon the decision of this court in the .case of La…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc. v. Milk Wagon Drivers' Union of Chicago No. 753Illinois Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Bldg. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Eastwood Mall, Inc. v. SlancoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Journeymen Barbers' International Union, Local 687 v. PollinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Schwab v. Moving Picture MacHine Operators Local No. 159Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Large v. DickTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Foutts v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists' International UnionOhio Supreme Court · 1951

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API