Wool Growers Service Corp. v. Simcoe Sheep Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Dissent
I shall refer to Allarbe as though he were the sole appellant.
In approaching a consideration of this case, I will admit,arguendo, that Allarbe was unjustly deprived of his money by the acts of Ragan and Dunnett, and that a trust relationship existed. I do contend, however, that Allarbe, with full knowledge of his alleged wrongs, made a complete settlement with Ragan and Dunnett, and afterwards confirmed that settlement by taking over and conducting the sheep business of the corporation.
"The basic element of a compromise is a disputed claim."Cannavina v. Poston, 13 Wn.2d 182, 124 P.2d 787.
A…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Oliver v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Burne v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Cannavina v. PostonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.