Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wool Growers Service Corp. v. Simcoe Sheep Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1943No. 28125Published

1Dissent

I shall refer to Allarbe as though he were the sole appellant.

In approaching a consideration of this case, I will admit,arguendo, that Allarbe was unjustly deprived of his money by the acts of Ragan and Dunnett, and that a trust relationship existed. I do contend, however, that Allarbe, with full knowledge of his alleged wrongs, made a complete settlement with Ragan and Dunnett, and afterwards confirmed that settlement by taking over and conducting the sheep business of the corporation.

"The basic element of a compromise is a disputed claim."Cannavina v. Poston, 13 Wn.2d 182, 124 P.2d 787.

A…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Oliver v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Burne v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Cannavina v. PostonWashington Supreme Court · 1942

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API