Legal Opinion

Smith v. VonCannon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1973No. 7319DC45PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Agency is a fact to be proved as any other, and where there is no evidence presented tending to establish an agency relationship the alleged principal is entitled to a directed verdict. Lindsey v. Leonard, 235 N.C. 100, 68 S.E. 2d 852 (1952). The directed verdict in favor of defendant Kirk’s Taxi Service, Inc., was therefore proper.

The plaintiffs contend that defendant VonCannon entered their land without permission or consent, that VonCannon is therefore a trespasser, and that he is, as a result of the trespass, strictly liable for all harm caused. Plaintiffs rely on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pafford v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Smith v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Schloss v. HallmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Dougherty v. . SteppSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1835
  5. Lindsey v. LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Poor v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Lake Mary Ltd. Partnership v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Albertson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Albertson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API