Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Leonard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1952No. 744PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtValeNtiNE, J.

There is some evidence of negligence and of causative relation between tbe operation of the automobile by Leonard and tbe injury sustained by Lindsey, but tbe quantum of evidence on these points is not tbe pressing question here.

Plaintiff seeks to recover of tbe defendant, Burnette Home Supply Company, on tbe doctrine of respondeat superior for injuries sustained by her intestate in tbe accident. Tbe Company denies all tbe essential allegations of tbe complaint. Plaintiff is, therefore, put to proof of every fact necessary to support her cause of action. This raises tbe question, is there…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Linville v. . NissenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Martin v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus LineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Colony Associates Ex Rel. Watson v. Fred L. Clapp & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Albertson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Albertson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Jackson v. MauneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API