Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Freeland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 31, 1998No. 216A98PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*616WYNN, Justice.

The sole issue arising out of the case sub judice is whether defendant Dean Freeland’s (“Freeland”) act of leaving a stick on his porch constituted negligence. Indeed, this case presents us with the simplest of factual scenarios — Freeland requested that plaintiff John Harvey Nelson (“Nelson”) pick him up at his house for a business meeting the two were attending, and Nelson, while doing so, tripped over a stick that Freeland had inadvertently left lying on his porch. Nelson brought this action against Freeland and his wife seeking damages for the injuries he sustained in the…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Stein v. Asheville City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Bridges v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Mallet v. PickensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API