Schloss v. Hallman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
A careful examination of this record reveals that -the conclusion of law set out hereinabove is not supported by the findings of fact. Neither is there any evidence to support the finding that the driver of the Beck truck failed to blow his horn before attempting to pass the Pontiac automobile. There is no evidence whatever in the record as to whether Hallman did or did not blow his horn before attempting to pass said automobile.
The evidence, however, does reveal that before the driver of Beck’s truck reached the intersection of Andrill Terrace and West Fifth Street, a Pontiac automobile…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Reeves v. . StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Reeves v. StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Cox v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Daughtry v. TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Smith v. VonCannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- York Industrial Center, Inc. v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Goodson v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.