Legal Opinion

Doll v. Maravilas

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1947No. Civ. 15777PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Ruth Doll, from a judgment for defendants Jock and Maravilas in an action to quiet title to certain restaurant equipment, to cancel the lease of the restaurant and the equipment, and to enjoin the defendants Maravilas from removing the equipment from the restaurant.

The background of the case is as follows. On or about January 8, 1945, one Tharalson, a real estate broker, contacted Olive Vienna, appellant’s mother and agent in the matters here involved, regarding the purchase from respondents Jock of the Evergreen Auto Court consisting of approximately 49…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Tanner v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Williams v. City of San Pedro Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Buttress & McClellan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Prager's, Inc. v. Bullitt Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  4. Gregers v. Peterson Ice Cream Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Spector v. National Pictures Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API