Rosenson v. Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.
A retainer agreement between a client and a law firm provided for binding arbitration of fee disputes. The parties initially participated in nonbinding arbitration pursuant to the Mandatory Fee Arbitration Act (MFAA; Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6200 et seq.).1 Within 30 days of a nonbinding MFAA arbitration award in favor of the client, the law firm filed a demand for binding arbitration under the retainer agreement. Rather than participate in binding arbitration, the client filed a petition to confirm the arbitration award. Agreeing with the client, the trial court ruled the law…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Wagner Construction Co. v. Pacific Mechanical Corp.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Spear v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Schatz v. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble & Mallory LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Judge v. Nijjar Realty, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Arshonsky v. Kim, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Naegele v. AlbersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hofer v. BoladianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Knitter & Knitter v. Du Par CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.