Fiddyment v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Jas. M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment and order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.
On or about the fifteenth day of January, 1907, plaintiff sold or agreed to sell to defendants all the baled hay belonging to plaintiff situated in two certain barns, at an agreed price per ton. At the time of the agreement $400 was paid on the purchase, and thereafter, from time to time, as appellants sent their schooners for the hay, portions were delivered and subsequently paid for.
On the twenty-third day of March, however, a flood occurred, which ruined and damaged the balance of the hay as it remained…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Sherwood v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Lassing v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Greenbaum v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Bill v. FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gianelli v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Miller v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Wanee v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Martin v. WhiteleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Todd v. LyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.