Legal Opinion
Todd v. Lyon
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 4, 1921No. Civ. No. 3724PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
From a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, for the purchase price of a stock of merchandise alleged to have been sold and delivered to defendants, they have appealed.
It appears that plaintiff was a merchant at La Mesa, California, where, in a storeroom owned by him, he carried a stock of goods necessary in conducting the business; that on November 1, 1919, he and defendants entered into a written agreement as follows:
“This agreement entered into between the Escondido Mer. Co. hereaiter known as the parties of the first part, & E. Todd, hereafter known as the parties of the second part.
“The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- The Elgee Cotton CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Lassing v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Young v. New Pedrara Onyx Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Greenbaum v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pray v. Trower Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Frazier v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Hass Bros. v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Simons v. Hill Street Fireproof Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923