Legal Opinion

Dodds v. Spring

California Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1917No. L. A. No. 3846PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. F. E. Densmore, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

MELVIN, J,

Plaintiff sued to foreclose a mortgage made by G. 0. Trauzettel and his wife, Georgia A. Trauzettel. The date of the said mortgage was December 1, 1908, and it was intended, as the court found, to cover principal and interest representing two loans evidenced by promissory notes, one dated December 1, 1908, for the principal sum of one thousand five hundred dollars due three years thereafter, and the other for one thousand one hundred and sixty dollars, bearing date April 1, 1909, due two years later. By the terms of the mortgage it apparently covered the west half of section 19,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Gordon v. WanseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. James v. YaegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. White v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Bailes v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Siekman v. MolerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Berrington v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Morris v. TwichellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API