Legal Opinion

Bailes v. Keck

California Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 8525PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This appeal is taken from a judgment dismissing the action upon an order made sustaining a demurrer to the complaint interposed by defendant Keck with leave to amend, and also from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate said order dismissing the action. Defendants Gillespie and Brittain made no appearance. It appears from the judgment that the demurrer was sustained on or about July 10, 1924, with leave to amend said complaint within ten days after service of notice of the court’s ruling upon plaintiff’s counsel. Notice was accordingly served upon said counsel for plaintiff, who, for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Enscoe v. FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Gordon v. WanseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. James v. YaegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Monahan v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Perkins v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Smith v. BentsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1932
  4. Berrington v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Cober v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API