Yule v. Bishop
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Alameda County. Action by John Yule against Charles R. Bishop and others. From an order granting plaintiff a new trial defendants, appeal. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an action by plaintiff to enforce the statutory liability of the stockholders for a debt of the corporation. Judgment passed for defendants. Plaintiff *514moved for and obtained an order granting him a new trial and from that order defendants appeal. The complaint, so far as is necessary for the consideration of the questions here presented, shows that the Consolidated Piedmont Cable Company, a corporation, borrowed from the Oakland Bank of Savings, upon its corporate note, the sum of $10,000. Before delivery of the note, Mrs. Phebe Blair placed her name upon the back thereof as an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Orem v. WrightsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Chipman v. Morill & WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Redington v. CornwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Moore v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Smith v. RumseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Coulter Dry Goods Co. v. WentworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Chambers v. FarnhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bailes v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Wills v. WoolnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.