Legal Opinion

Siekman v. Moler

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1929No. 5115PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, as assignees, instituted this action for the foreclosure of mortgage executed by Clarence G. Moler and wife in favor of Barnes Bros., Incorporated, and for deficiency judgment against Moler, the mortgagor, and Henry "Whitson, a subsequent grantee of the mortgaged premises. The issue in this court relates solely to the personal liability of the latter. The complaint alleged that subsequent to the execution of the mortgage the mortgagors conveyed the premises to the defendant, Whitson, and “that by the terms of said deed the defendant . . . . Whitson, accepted…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. White v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Winston v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Herrin v. AbbeSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. Ordway v. DowneyWashington Supreme Court · 1898

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Murr v. Selag Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Klundt v. CarothersIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hinckley Estate Co. v. GurryIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. First National Bank v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Walter H. Sullivan, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API