Norwest Bank Arizona, N.A v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HODGES, Judge.
Plaintiff Arizona Millwork was a subcontractor on a Navy project to provide modular buildings to the prime contractor. Plaintiff ceased delivering the modules until the prime would agree to assign its payments on the contract to Arizona Millwork’s bank. The contractor assigned the payments and the modules were delivered, but the Navy paid the contractor instead. Plaintiffs argue that the Navy violated a valid and enforceable assignment; defendant contends that the bank did not have a valid assignment.
We hold that the Government was obligated to pay the bank because the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mullaney v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nelson Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- JGB Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Riviera Finance of Texas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- O. Ahlborg & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- International Fidelity Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.