O. Ahlborg & Sons, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*180OPINION
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Plaintiff, O. Ahlborg & Sons, Ine. (“Ahl-borg”), seeks $2,199,000 pursuant to an alleged implied-in-fact contract with the Maritime Administration of the United States Department of Transportation (“MARAD”). In the alternative, Plaintiff seeks to recover as a third-party beneficiary under a contract among MARAD, Massachusetts Heavy Industries, Inc. and MHI Shipbuilding, LLC.1 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Cross-Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Arbelaez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- G4s Technology LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Threshold Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Lea v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.