Legal Opinion

O. Ahlborg & Sons, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 31, 2006No. 02-272CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*180OPINION

WILLIAMS, Judge.

Plaintiff, O. Ahlborg & Sons, Ine. (“Ahl-borg”), seeks $2,199,000 pursuant to an alleged implied-in-fact contract with the Maritime Administration of the United States Department of Transportation (“MARAD”). In the alternative, Plaintiff seeks to recover as a third-party beneficiary under a contract among MARAD, Massachusetts Heavy Industries, Inc. and MHI Shipbuilding, LLC.1 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Cross-Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, for…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Arbelaez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. G4s Technology LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Threshold Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Lea v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API