Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Rutt

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 22, 2012No. A12-0335PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOOTEN, Judge.

In this second appeal in a probate action, appellants argue that the district court erroneously applied Minn.Stat. § 549.09, in two ways. First, appellants argue the district court erred by ordering that interest begin to accrue on the decedent’s date of death. Second, appellants argue that the district court erred by applying the interest rate for judgments over $50,000 to a judgment for $73,592, which consisted of three transactions for $50,000 or less. Appellants also argue that the district court erred in refusing to reconsider its valuation and distribution of real…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Ganguli v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Davies v. West Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. In Re the Maltreatment & Disqualification of KlevenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the Child Of: J.P.-S. and J.D.F., ParentsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  2. Eric Wong v. Chatterbox Pub Enterprises, Inc., Tyrone SharpeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  3. In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel GoemaatCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. M. B. (Mth) and I. C. R. (Alleged Fth) and any Unknown Father, Parents....Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API