In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the Child Of: J.P.-S. and J.D.F., Parents
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOTEN, Judge.
In this appeal, appellant mother challenges the district court’s determination of her parental fee for the out-of-home placements of her child. Appellant argues that the district court utilized the wrong statute in calculating her monthly parental fee and erred by failing to address her argument that she should have received a child support offset against her share of the costs. We affirm the district court’s decision.
FACTS
Appellant mother J.P.-S. (appellant) and respondent father J.D.F. (father) are the parents of J.F. Upon the dissolution of their marriage, appellant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Welfare of K. L. W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- In re the Marriage of: Teresa Marie Nordahl v. Steven Edward NordahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: V. R. R. and M. A. H., Parents, Commissioner of Human Services, Legal ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024