Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the Child Of: J.P.-S. and J.D.F., Parents

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 2016No. A15-1729PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOOTEN, Judge.

In this appeal, appellant mother challenges the district court’s determination of her parental fee for the out-of-home placements of her child. Appellant argues that the district court utilized the wrong statute in calculating her monthly parental fee and erred by failing to address her argument that she should have received a child support offset against her share of the costs. We affirm the district court’s decision.

FACTS

Appellant mother J.P.-S. (appellant) and respondent father J.D.F. (father) are the parents of J.F. Upon the dissolution of their marriage, appellant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Welfare of K. L. W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  2. In re the Marriage of: Teresa Marie Nordahl v. Steven Edward NordahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
  3. In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: V. R. R. and M. A. H., Parents, Commissioner of Human Services, Legal ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API