Legal Opinion
Metcalf Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 2, 2002No. 02-55CPublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Senior Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Procedural Posture
This post-award bid protest case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment based upon the administrative record.2 The U.S. Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction to hear post-award bid protest cases pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b). At the time plaintiff Metcalf filed its initial motions and complaint,3 the defendant had previously agreed to defer issuance of a Notice to Proceed with performance of the contract until April 26, 2002. A status hearing on plaintiffs initial filings was held on January 23,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Banknote Corp. of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Textron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Serco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- DMS All-Star Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- PGBA, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.