Wyeth v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JOSEPH J. FARNAN, JR., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Impax’s (“Impax”) Motion To Compel Production Of Documents (D.I. 36). The Motion concerns a series of issues that the court will address individually. For the reasons discussed, the Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
1. Production Of Pleadings, Deposition Transcripts, Hearing Transcripts And Orders From The Teva Litigation
By its Motion, Impax contends that Plaintiff Wyeth (“Wyeth”) has “refused to produce all pleadings, deposition transcripts, hearing transcripts, expert reports, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
3Cited by18 opinions
- in Re State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Aguilar v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement Division of United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- United States ex rel. Carter v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- John B. v. GoetzDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.