Legal Opinion

Wyeth v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 26, 2006No. Civ.A. 06-222-JJFPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

JOSEPH J. FARNAN, JR., District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Impax’s (“Impax”) Motion To Compel Production Of Documents (D.I. 36). The Motion concerns a series of issues that the court will address individually. For the reasons discussed, the Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

1. Production Of Pleadings, Deposition Transcripts, Hearing Transcripts And Orders From The Teva Litigation

By its Motion, Impax contends that Plaintiff Wyeth (“Wyeth”) has “refused to produce all pleadings, deposition transcripts, hearing transcripts, expert reports, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. in Re State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Aguilar v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement Division of United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. United States ex rel. Carter v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. John B. v. GoetzDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API