Legal Opinion
United States v. O'Keefe
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 18, 2008No. Cr. 06-249 (PLF/JMF)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
The indictment charges that the defendant, Michael John O’Keefe, Sr., when em ployed by the Department of State in Canada, received, quid pro quo, gifts and other benefits from his co-defendant, Snnil Agra-wal, for expediting visa requests for employees of Agrawal’s company, STS Jewels.
By his Order of April 27, 2007, Judge Friedman required the government to conduct a thorough and complete search of both its hard copy and electronic files in “a good faith effort to uncover all responsive information in its ‘possession custody…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- United States v. BecksteadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Hubbard v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- William A. Gross Construction Associates, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Ford Motor Co. v. Edgewood Properties, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Moore v. Publicis GroupeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.