State v. Savastano
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, C. J.
This case requires us to examine Article I, section 20, of the Oregon Constitution — the privileges or immunities provision — in the context of prosecutorial discretion. Specifically, we must determine whether Article I, section 20, applies to prosecutors’ charging decisions and, if so, whether a prosecutor must consistently adhere to a coherent, systematic policy in making charging decisions.
Defendant was accused of embezzling money from her employer in numerous transactions over a period of 16 months, and the prosecutor aggregated those transactions to indict defendant on 16 counts of theft…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Kramer v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.