Legal Opinion

State v. Savastano

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 2013No. CC C081586CR; CA A141053; SC S059973PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, C. J.

This case requires us to examine Article I, section 20, of the Oregon Constitution — the privileges or immunities provision — in the context of prosecutorial discretion. Specifically, we must determine whether Article I, section 20, applies to prosecutors’ charging decisions and, if so, whether a prosecutor must consistently adhere to a coherent, systematic policy in making charging decisions.

Defendant was accused of embezzling money from her employer in numerous transactions over a period of 16 months, and the prosecutor aggregated those transactions to indict defendant on 16 counts of theft…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Kramer v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API