Legal Opinion

Priest v. Pearce

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1992No. SC S39032PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*413GILLETTE, J.

In this original habeas corpus proceeding, we are called upon to decide whether the right to suitable bail guaranteed by Article I, section 14, of the Oregon Constitution, set out post, is available to a convicted criminal defendant during the pendency of his or her appeal. We hold that the scope of Article I, section 14, does not extend to appeals.

Plaintiff, who is the defendant in an underlying criminal case, pleaded guilty on October 17, 1991, to charges of second and fourth degree assault. By a judgment entered on January 15, 1992, he was sentenced to 20 months in jail.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State v. PinnellOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MoylettOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. SorianoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API