Legal Opinion

Horton v. Oregon Health & Science University

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2016No. CC 1108-11209; SC S061992PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*171KISTLER, J.

The question that this case presents is whether a statute limiting a state employee’s tort liability violates either the remedy clause of Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution or the jury trial clauses of Article I, section 17, and Article VII (Amended), section 3, of the Oregon Constitution. The trial court held that the statute, as applied to the state employee, violated each of those provisions and entered a limited judgment against the employee for the full amount of the jury’s verdict. On direct appeal, we reverse the trial court’s limited judgment and remand this…

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. State v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. DeJongOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Waite v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Hunters Ridge Condominium Ass'n v. Sherwood Crossing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API