Kramer v. City of Lake Oswego
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
**425Plaintiffs seek a declaration that the City of Lake Oswego must allow them recreational access to Oswego Lake, either from the shoreline of the city's waterfront parks-from which the city prohibits all water access-or through the city's residents-only swim park. According to plaintiffs, the common-law doctrines of public trust and public use protect the public's right to enter the lake, and the city's restrictions on access to the lake are contrary to those common-law doctrines. Plaintiffs also contend that the city's restrictions violate the Equal Privileges and Immunities guarantee of…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Corvallis v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Kramer v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- McCormick v. State Parks and Recreation Dept.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Chernaik v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- City of Portland v. Building Codes Div.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.