Legal Opinion

Kramer v. City of Lake Oswego

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2019No. SC S065014PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

**425Plaintiffs seek a declaration that the City of Lake Oswego must allow them recreational access to Oswego Lake, either from the shoreline of the city's waterfront parks-from which the city prohibits all water access-or through the city's residents-only swim park. According to plaintiffs, the common-law doctrines of public trust and public use protect the public's right to enter the lake, and the city's restrictions on access to the lake are contrary to those common-law doctrines. Plaintiffs also contend that the city's restrictions violate the Equal Privileges and Immunities guarantee of…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Corvallis v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Kramer v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  3. McCormick v. State Parks and Recreation Dept.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Chernaik v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  5. City of Portland v. Building Codes Div.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API