Legal Opinion
Brzezinek v. Covenant Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 10, 2002No. AC 22257PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiffs, Cesar Brzezinek and Janina Brzezinek, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered upon the granting of the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, Covenant Insurance Company. The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) ruled that they did not timely accept the defendant’s offer to form a contract to settle a potential action and (2) failed to conclude that the defendant was barred by the doctrine of equitable estoppel from refusing to execute the settlement agreement. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wellington Systems, Inc. v. Redding Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Katz v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- W. v. W.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Green v. Connecticut Disposal Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Greenwood Associates, Inc. v. Crestar BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ghent v. Meadowhaven Condominium, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance v. SakonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Demattia v. MauroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Jaramillo v. CaseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Glorioso v. Police Department of BurlingtonConnecticut Superior Court · 2003