Legal Opinion
Glorioso v. Police Department of Burlington
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 10, 2003No. File No. X01 CV 02-0168481SPublished
1Opinion of the CourtHodgson, J.
Executrix Eileen Glorioso, the plaintiff in the above-captioned case, has brought claims against several parties, including the defendant Bristol Hospital EMS, LLC (hospital), in connection with their responses to a 911 call for emergency medical attention when the plaintiffs decedent, David Glorioso, became ill while visiting relatives for Thanksgiving on November 23, 2000.
The hospital has moved to strike nine of the twelve counts against it: counts nineteen, thirty, fifty-two, sixty-three, eighty-five, ninety-six, 107, 118 and 129. It is useful to group the counts according to common issues…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc. v. BOC Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Ferryman v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.