Legal Opinion
Demattia v. Mauro
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 16, 2004No. AC 24433; AC 24434PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*3 Opinion
FLYNN, J.
John R. DeMattia appeals from the judgments of the trial court rendered in favor of Patricia Mauro1 ordering the return to her of all sums that she paid to DeMattia in connection with a real estate contract.2 On appeal, DeMattia claims that the court improperly (1) found that as of July 31, 2000, Mauro had obtained a mortgage commitment and was ready, willing and able to complete the real estate closing, (2) found that the period between June 15, 2000, the contractually scheduled closing date, and October 24, 2000, was a reasonable time for Mauro to close and (3) ordered all…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Issler v. IsslerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Wallenta v. MoscowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Venture Partners, Ltd. v. Synapse Technologies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Allen v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fernandes v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Little Mountains Enterprises, Inc. v. GroomConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Jaramillo v. CaseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Alers v. BemerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
- Yates v. Royal Consumer Products, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022