Legal Opinion
Young v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 7, 2010No. 09-442CPublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Plaintiff Rickie J. Young, proceeding pro ne, moves, pursuant to Rule 59(a) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), for reconsideration of the court’s April 22, 2010 Opinion and Order dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Alternatively, he seeks relief from the court’s judgment pursuant to RCFC 60(b). For the reasons set forth below, the court denies plaintiffs motions.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff initially filed suit in the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Federal Claims”) on October 6, 2006, alleging that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Biery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Remote Diagnostic Technologies LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Oenga v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Fillmore Equipment of Holland, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.