Legal Opinion
Remote Diagnostic Technologies LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 18, 2017No. 17-333 CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SMITH, Senior Judge
This action is before the Court on defendant-intervenor’s Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff, Remote Diagnostic Technologies, LLC (“RDT”), challenges the Defense .Logistics Agency’s (“DLA,” “Agency,” or “government”) decision to amend the requirements under Solicitation No. SPE2D1-15-R-0005 (the “Solicitation”). On May 22, 2017, defendant-intervenor, Zoll Medical Corporation (“Zoll” or “intervenor”), filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), alleging that RDT lacks standing in this bid protest…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- A. M. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Adair v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Akira Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.