Legal Opinion
Biery v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 23, 2016No. 2014-5084PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Court of Federal Claims awarding them attorney fees under the fee shifting provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 4654(c), Plaintiffs’ counsel asserts that the Court of Federal Claims erred when it made a number of reductions to its requested fee award. Also pending before this court are plaintiffs’ motion to supple ment the record and plaintiffs’ motion to order payment of the uncontested attorney fee amount. For reasons discussed below, plaintiffs’ motion to supplement the record is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Greenwood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Afge Local 3599 v. E.E.O.C.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.