Legal Opinion
Hardy v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 28, 2016No. 14-388LPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RCFC 59(a)(1); Motion for Reconsideration; Deed; Interpretation of Deeds Under Georgia Law; Easement; Scope of Easement; Fee Simple; Adverse Possession; Claim of Right; Color of Title
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
Plaintiffs move, pursuant to Rule 59(a)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), for reconsideration of the court’s May 4, 2016 ruling on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (“summary judgment ruling”). For the reasons set forth below, the court denies in part and grants in part plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration.
I. BACKGROUND
In this…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Biery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Georgia Power Co. v. IrvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hardy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Barlow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Ansley Walk Condominium Association, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.