Legal Opinion

Collyer v. Egbert

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1939No. 27469. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

In his amended complaint upon which the action was tried, plaintiff alleged that the defendants J. L. Egbert and Jerry Vandos were copartners, doing business in the city of Everett under the trade name of Everett Petroleum Distributing Company; that, October 1, 1937, plaintiff delivered to defendant Egbert his check for eight hundred dollars, the proceeds thereof to be used for the purpose of buying a truck for plaintiff; that Egbert, without plaintiff’s knowledge or consent, deposited the check to the credit of the partnership composed of himself and Vandos; and that the partnership used the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. KilburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Constanti v. BarovicWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Cruickshank v. LichWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Potter v. ScheffskyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Barovic v. ConstantiWashington Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. McLendonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Dygert v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lambert v. Weyerhaeuser Co. (In Re Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API