Barovic v. Constanti
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
For a number of years prior to Ms death in the summer of 1932, Dominic Constanti owned and operated a number of moving picture theaters in Tacoma, Puyallup and Sumner. The plaintiff, his son-in-law, was manager of the theaters in Puyallup and Sumner.
In the late fall of 1929, Barovic was approached by one McNérney with a proposition to build a theater at Aberdeen. McNerney at that time was sales manager for United Artists Corporation at Seattle. He had known both Constanti and Barovic for a number of years. His idea, as first presented to Barovic, was to establish theaters, not only at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nicholson v. KilburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Andrews v. KelleherWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Brownfield v. HollandWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Stipich v. KrilichWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Stowell v. Cashmere Apple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eder v. ReddickWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Constanti v. BarovicWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Gilkes v. BeezerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Collyer v. EgbertWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re the Estate of FinkeWashington Supreme Court · 1936