Legal Opinion

Cruickshank v. Lich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1930No. 22154. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

The purpose of this action is to recover three thousand dollars advanced to the defendants and balance due for services rendered to the defendants. Plaintiff alleged that, by contract of November, 1922, he agreed to purchase a five-thousand-dollar interest in the ranch of the defendants, who agreed to employ the plaintiff on that ranch at a salary of one hundred dollars monthly. From November 1, 1922, to July 1, 1926, plaintiff paid in cash, to the defendants and earned in wages a total of seventy-four hundred dollars. Defendants refused to comply with the contract and paid to plaintiff, on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rohrig v. PearsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. Limpscomb v. BallardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Norm Advertising, Inc. v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Eder v. ReddickWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Bengston v. ShainWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Minder v. GurleyWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Collyer v. EgbertWashington Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API