Legal Opinion

Skelton Ranch, Inc. v. Pondera County Canal & Reservoir Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2014No. DA 12-0698PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wheat

¶1 Claimants Gregory Duncan, Sherri Donovan, and Terry Dougherty (collectively Duncan) and Skelton Angus Ranch, Inc. (Skelton) appeal from a decision of the Montana Water Court that amended the Water Master’s (Water) Report and adopted it as amended. We affirm.

¶2 We address the following issues:

¶3 1. Did the ChiefWater Judge properly admit historical documents prepared by Pondera County Canal & Reservoir Company (Pondera) in anticipation of litigation?

¶4 2. Did the ChiefWater Judge correctly reject the Master’s findings regarding certain variables used to determine the historical capacity of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Amadeo v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Jefferson Garden Associates v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Eldorado Coop Canal Co. v. Ben HogMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. City of Helena v. Community of RiminiMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Parenting of G.J.A. Minor ChildMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Teton Co-Op Canal Co. v. Teton Co-Op Reservoir Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Curry v. Pondera County Canal & Reservoir Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API