Legal Opinion

Curry v. Pondera County Canal & Reservoir Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2016No. DA 14-0529PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wheat

¶1 Gene R. Curry, Cheryl S. Curry, and Curry Cattle Co. (Curry) appeal from an order of the Montana Water Court that determined Pondera County Canal & Reservoir Company (Pondera) is entitled to claim beneficial use based on the maximum number of shares authorized by the Montana Carey Land Board (MCLB), a service area for its place of use, the extent of the acreage included in the service area, the adjustment of the flow rate for Claim Nos. 41M 162000-00 and 41M 162109-00, and the reversal of the dismissal of Claim No. 41M 199797-00. Pondera cross-appeals from the portion of the order…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Smith v. DenniffMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bailey v. TintingerMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Tucker v. Missoula Light & Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Quigley v. McIntoshMontana Supreme Court · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Advocates v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  2. United States v. Barthelmess Ranch Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In Re Teton Coop. Reservoir Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. USA BLM - BarthelmessMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Twin Creeks v. PetroliaMontana Supreme Court · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API