Legal Opinion

Eldorado Coop Canal Co. v. Ben Hog

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2016No. DA 15-0576PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 Eldorado Coop Canal Company appeals the order of the Ninth Judicial District Court, Teton County, denying its dissatisfied water user complaint. Appellees, the Lower Teton Joint Objectors (Joint Objectors), appeared as interested parties in the District Court proceeding. We restate the dispositive issue on appeal as follows:

Whether the District Court erred in denying Eldorado’s dissatisfied water user complaint.

¶2 We affirm.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶3 The Water Court currently is in the process of adjudicating the existing water right claims of all appropriators in the Teton River…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Havre Daily News, LLC v. City of HavreMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Montanans for Justice: Vote No on CI-98 Not in Montana: Citizens Against CI-97 & Property Owners Against I-154 v. State Ex Rel. McGrathMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Luppold v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Stokes v. Montana Thirteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Skelton Ranch, Inc. v. Pondera County Canal & Reservoir Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Matter of N.A.Montana Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. R. TalksaboutMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. 623 Partners, LLC v. HunterMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Hill County High School District No. a v. Dick Anderson Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Hillcrest Natural v. DEQMontana Supreme Court · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API