Legal Opinion

Amadeo v. Zant

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 31, 1988No. 87-5277PublishedCited by 350 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

In considering petitioner’s motion for a writ of habeas corpus, the District Court concluded that petitioner successfully established cause for his failure to raise in the state trial court a constitutional challenge to the composition of the ju ries that indicted him, convicted him, and sentenced him to death. This case presents the question whether the factual findings upon which the District Court based its conclusion were clearly erroneous.

I

Petitioner Tony B. Amadeo was convicted of murder and criminal attempt to commit theft in November 1977 in the Superior Court of Putnam County,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by350 opinions

  1. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Banks v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. James Yates Rust, Jr., A/K/A James Yeats Rust, Jr. v. Rex A. Zent, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

345 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API