Legal Opinion

Zink v. Enzminger Steel, LLC

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2011No. 20100359PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Doug Zink and Ted Keller appeal from the district court judgment dismissing their complaint, denying their motions, and awarding Enzminger Steel attorney’s fees and costs.1 We reverse *866and remand the district court judgment dismissing Zink’s complaint with prejudice, because he was not given notice of the court’s order demanding proof of a partnership and an opportunity to respond. We also reverse and remand the dismissal of the complaint with prejudice as to Keller, and hold that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Finally, we reverse the district court’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Livingood v. MeeceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Ward v. ShippNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Ennis v. DasovickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Beckler v. Bismarck Public School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kosobud v. KosobudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Kalenburg v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Killoran, et al. v. KalerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API