Legal Opinion

Ennis v. Dasovick

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1993No. Civ. 920339PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

Edward Ennis’s glasses are broken. He is an inmate at the State Penitentiary and wants the State to buy him a new pair. Seeking new glasses, Ennis brought a civil rights action on behalf of himself and “all others similarly situated.” He sued the director of corrections, the warden, the medical director, a medical records clerk and “other unknown parties.” Under Rule 12(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., the district court, on its own motion, dismissed Ennis’s suit with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Although Ennis may not sue on behalf of others,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Martin v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. George Mandel v. John Doe (Name Unknown, an Escambia County Prison Employee), Escambia County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. DuPaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. One Black 1989 Cadillac VIN 1G6DW51Y8KR722027North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Berlin v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. BensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State Ex Rel. Schuetzle v. VogelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API